“The story of a boy who became a man… By becoming a bear.”

primedoverlord:

xxtc-96xx:

xxmileikaivanaxx:

nearsightedgirl:

animated-butts:

This movie is way too under appreciated in my opinion… The fandom is practically non-existent…

And I don’t understand why? The plot was fantastic.

All of the characters were lovable.

There was no one that you absolutely could not stand.

The “bad guy” was actually the main character, Kenai. Which was an interesting twist for Disney.

But by building a bond with this young cub (Koda), and seeing the world through the eyes of a bear, he realized that he (as a man) had been the monster… Not bears.

I mean, talk about character development…

Koda: Those monsters are really scary… Especially with their sticks.


And for me, this scene right here was one of my most emotional Disney moments. You can’t even here Kenai telling the actual story… But you can see their facial expressions and you can just feel it. You know exactly what he’s saying to Koda.

Kenai: Well, I have a story to tell you.

Koda: Really? What’s it about?

Kenai: Well, it’s kind of about a man… and kind of about a bear. But mostly, it’s about a monster.

… Koda… I did something very wrong.


Okay, but on a lighter note?

The animation was incredible.

Amazing.

It was a powerful movie about brotherly love, guidance, and responsibility, and it truly is one of my favorite Disney movies ever.

Not to mention the soundtrack is amazing. You can’t go wrong with Phil Collins.

The fandom will never be huge, but the movie definitely deserves more credit. If you haven’t watched it, I highly recommend it.

Brother Bear

I want to remind everyone that this movie is where the “quit telling everyone I’m dead” “Sometimes I can still hear his voice” joke came from.

This is still one of my favourite Disney films ever. 

It’s funny, according to critics no one liked this movie and it was panned hard..and yet anyone I talk to (including myself) LOVED this movie

People are weird

The fans probably migrated over to Brave once it came out. Which is pretty much the same basic idea, someone turns into a bear to learn a life lesson, but in this case, it’s the mother of the protagonist, not the protagonist. Yet it still feels like they tried to resurrect Brother Bear through the same basic plot idea. 

randomfandomteacher:

surprisebitch:

marlyindeed:

coelasquid:

Hey kid, what’s going on, want to check out my pit of souls?

image

Yeah, those souls sure are way deep down in that pit there huh?

image

Or… not? Get your hands out of my soul pit.

image

Okay, I’ll admit that’s apparently some impressive reach…

image

Like, really impressive reach….

image

EVERY TIME I WATCH HERCULES I DON’T UNDERSTAND THIS SCENE

maybe it was high tide then it became low tide all of a sudden? maybe it was an illusion? maybe fuck physics?

This bothered me so much as kid.

karmadash-is-reylotrash:

inked-up-devil-doc:

lasimms:

sugar-women:

nicolas-px:

moe-moe-watches:

once-delight:

xavantina:

drsofialamb:

the sudden decrease in animation quality between the first hunchback and the sequel is both hilarious and sad 

The Return of Jafar

charliekelly69:

i had to reblog this because im actually pissig mysefl

Let’s take a second to compare Aladdin to The Return of Jafar:

Ouch

Esmorolda and Corpet

kelverse

I’ve been hysterically wheezy laughing at the last gif for about two minutes solid

I get so angry, then u get to the last gif and I’m crying of laughter

I went and saw The Jungle Book on Sunday and it is gorgeous. Just overall there’s a really nice attention given to realistic detail in both the environment and the characters. Like the way the animals move, and Mowgli actually gets scrapes and bruises throughout the movie which was a nice touch.

thesweetpianowritingdownmylife:

slbtumblng:

fantastic-nonsense:

smokefilledbubbles:

fckreality:

gabnab:

lexistentialism:

aes-of-spades:

Disney vs. Original

The last one is the most important.

^^

Yup

Ex for pocahontas was 8 we know that now

Oh good, I get to debunk fairy tale ridiculousness again. It’s been awhile since I’ve been able to use my fairy tale knowledge on here.

Okay, first of all, there is no such thing as an “original” version of a fairy tale; there are only “popular” or “accepted” versions. All versions of fairy tales are as valid as any other version given their history as oral tales; each tale twists and changes as it spreads to other cultures, and several tale types have similar tales that formed independently of each other in various places around the world (Cinderella is the most famous example, with over 1,000 recorded variations and some of the oldest versions being found in Greece, China, and Egypt).

Second of all, several of these are patently false. I’ll just go down the list.

  • Snow White and Hunchback are the two that are actually true. In the Grimms version of Snow White (”Little Snow White”), the Queen does ask for her liver and lungs (though this was later revised to the Queen asking for her heart) and she is forced to dance in red hot shoes until she dies. This is the norm for Snow White tales, though the specifics vary quite a lot. Hunchback is similarly grim, which makes since given that it’s based on a book by Victor Hugo (like, come on. This is the same guy that wrote Les Mis. You expected something different?). The Rapunzel one is also more or less true, as is the Hercules one.
  • Clarification on the Little Mermaid one: she doesn’t actually wind up in purgatory. Since she was a mermaid and not a human, she didn’t have a soul and so when she killed herself, became a “daughter of the air” and can earn a soul (and thus proceed up to heaven) if she does good deeds for mankind for 300 years. Purgatory is a Catholic construction, and the probability that Hans Christian Andersen was Catholic is very very small considering that Roman Catholicism remained illegal in Denmark for nearly three centuries after the Lutheran Reformation in the mid 1500s.
  • Cinderella: This is only true in the Grimms/German version. I’ve actually written a paper on revenge and retribution in Cinderella tales across the world, so I can tell you with a great deal amount of certainty that it greatly depends on which Cinderella tale you’re looking at for the fate of the stepmother/stepsisters. Perrault’s Cinderella/the French version, on which the Disney movie was based, ended with Cinderella forgiving her stepsisters and inviting them to live with her in the palace. The only thing they are denied is the ability to marry the prince.
  • Pocahontas: this one is pretty half-and-half; there is absolutely no evidence that John Smith raped and impregnated Pocahontas before, during, or after his time in Jamestown. Historical accounts maintain that Pocahontas was friends with John Smith and often visited Jamestown during the years he was there. When the English reported that Smith had died after being sent back to England to treat him for injuries from a gunpowder incident, she stopped visiting the settlement for a couple of years. It’s also maintained in the historical accounts that when she visited, she often brought food and kept several of the settlers from starving. Historical accounts do not say that they were lovers, that she was of suitable age for a relationship (period), or that there were any sexual implications to their relationship. It is only in fictional accounts of their relationship (particularly in the Disney version, where she was significantly aged up) that that relationship is portrayed as romantic.
  • (cont) There are a couple of scholars that say she was raped during her captivity by the English (which happened long after Smith left for England), but the majority of the scholarship agrees that she was not raped.

    Her only child is by John Rolfe and he was conceived after they were married, so the ‘raped and impregnated’ claim is wrong as well.

    She was also not kidnapped and taken to England. She and John Rolfe were married before they left for England…for a good two years, in fact. She and Rolfe traveled to England, stayed for a year and a half, and then boarded a ship to return to Virginia, where Pocahontas died of an unknown disease along the way.

  • Mulan: false. I’ll let this post do the explaining for me, because it explains it better than I ever could. The actual ballad of Hua Mulan says no such thing; the ending this post describes is from a book called the “Sui Tang Romance” and is basically fanfiction of the actual Hua Mulan legend. The tragic end is “a detail that cannot be found in any previous legends or stories associated Hua Mulan.”
  • Beauty and the Beast: patently and blatantly false. I have never been so insulted by a statement about a fairy tale in my life, and I argue about Cinderella on a regular basis. There is no BATB variant tale where the Beast ends up eating the girl after the wedding. The Beaumont/French tale (again, the version on which the Disney version was based), has the Beast dying of heartbreak because Beauty was late returning to the castle, but ends with the Beast and Beauty happily married after she proclaimed her love for him. Here are links to BATB tales around the world, just because I want to correct the awful monstrosity that was “the Beast ends up eating Belle after the wedding.” Also, here’s a link to my favorite BATB variant, the Norwegian “East of the Sun and West of the Moon,” and a link to “Cupid and Psyche,” the tale on which many BATB tales are based. The Aarne-Thompson tale type for Beauty and the Beast is 425 for anyone interested (425A tales are Cupid and Psyche tales and 425C tales are BATB tales).

Basically, this post is a hodge-podge of mostly true to embarrassingly and infuriatingly false information. Do your own research, and don’t believe everything the internet tries to tell you about fairy tales.

Also, the Huncheback is right, but it’s missing lots of stuff. In the novel, he is deaf  (which both the disney movie and the musical erased btw) so when Esmeralda’s friends come to rescue her (like, hundreds of them?) Quasimodo thinks they’re coming to kill her, and MURDERS HALF OF THEM DEFENDING NOTRE DAMME LIKE A FORTRESS. 

Also Phoebus was a TOTAL DICK who had a fiancée named Fleur-de-lys and who wanted to bang 16-year-old Esmeralda as a final “treat” before his wedding.

But  surprisingly enough, the goat was 100% real in the book.