like, this is probably a great example of someone (probably accidentally) training their pet to headbutt them/smack them in the face. Â this is a smart newfie, obviously, because he picks up on it right away, but you can see – the first time he bonks this girl in the head, his owners laugh, the woman cuddles him and baby-talks him, so he immediately does it again. Â because he got positive attention the first time. Â
(weâve all done this, I think; but itâs worth it to point out that the next time this newfie performs this behavior at an inappropriate time and gets yelled at/negative attention, heâs gonna be confused.) Â
Yes! This is a beautiful example of someone accidentally reinforcing a behavior. That affectionate attention is a positive, so the dog is going to continue to perform the behavior that was the antecedent for it. You broke it down beautifully. Â
Fucking THANK you for this post!! Ive been waiting for the âdominant alphaâ theory to die out. It gets me so heated i swear!!!
Itâs so ridiculous that people insist on applying an incorrect theory about wolves to dogs, and then try to apply it to humans too
Seriously that last bit, tho. Even if you want to apply animal dominance hierarchy crap to humans, weâre primates. PRIMATES.Â
Yes this. This is why the concept of dominance in dogs is basically a pile of crap.
Also I havenât got time to go into it but peopleâs understanding of âdominanceâ as it relates to animals is pretty flawed. Itâs actually quite variable so itâs things like
A is dominant over B for food but C is dominant over A B is dominant over C and A for the spot by the window A is dominant over B and C for the squeaky bone
Whenever I hear a zookeeper talk about dominance or god forbid use the word alpha sincerely I cringe
Lol people still believe in alpha theory? How retro.
Everyone believes in alpha theory because a) Cesar and b) science doesnât trickle down and I hate it.Â
I have to be a pedant here but this infographic is getting training terms wrong again. Striking a dog or putting their nose in poop is positive punishment, because youâre adding something to try to decrease the behavior happening again. People get positive punishment confused with negative reinforcement all the time (seriously itâs one of the hardest things for trainers to define sometimes), but theyâre not the same. (Negative reinforcement involves removing something to make a behavior happen more frequently – itâs often called pressure and release training, and can be used with positive punishment but is not always).Â
What @starrypawz is describing in their reblog is called situational social dominance, which basically says âdifferent dogs will stand up for different things in different scenarios, depending on how much they value the thing and what the dynamics of the group regarding the thing are.â
Sorry to break in with this on a very much Sherlock-only kind of blog- I promise not to make a regular thing of this, but this is something thatâs happened TWICE now.Â
This is Beyli. Heâs a two-month old foal and heâs adorable. He belongs to a friend of the family.Â
So adorable, in fact, that a member of the public spent a nice afternoon feeding him. You feed the ducks and thatâs ok. right? Itâs a nice thing to do.Â
They fed him turnip. He choked and gave himself a stomachache as a result.
The problem is that horses canât really burp and horses canât vomit. Their digestive systems are fine-tuned and when they go wrong, they go really wrong. Colic in horses is difficult to treat and in Beyliâs case, like many others, proved to be insurmountable. With pain medicine not working, after 4 hours of doing their best with no improvement, the vet called time on his suffering rather than let him go on to a very slow and painful end.Â
A horse needlessly suffered and died because someone fed him the wrong thing. They werenât necessarily malicious, they were just hugely ignorant. And worse, they were hugely entitled. There were already signs asking people not to feed the animals. As I said, this has now happened TWICE to the same family, and theyâre by no means alone.Â
PLEASEÂ Donât feed horses that donât belong to you.Â
Horses can have disorders, diabetes, allergies and dietry requirements and you have NO IDEA if what youâre giving them is acceptable or not. Even âsafeâ things like carrot and apple could be âwrongâ for this particular horse. Grass clippings? Not okay. Grain? Not okay for a horse that hasnât been regularly eating it.Â
Donât assume. i have seen walkers pull up random plants and offer them over the fence INCLUDING TOXIC, DEADLY weeds like ragwort. Iâve seen horses offered dog-biscuits and bread. Iâve heard of horses being regularly fed by strangers thinking they were being under-fed, when the horse in question was on a vet-given diet to control weight and other conditions.Â
Donât feed horses that donât belong to you even little treats and things like sugar cubes because it gives them bad manners. They start biting and harassing people. Itâs bad for their teeth and too much sugar is terrible for them.
In some places if the owner has liability insurance, if you can be identified, YOU will be legally responsible for the vetâs bills. And if youâre thinking âwell, theyâd never identify meâ, then thatâs besides the point.Â
Please. You wouldnât feed someoneâs dog without asking, I hope. You definitely wouldnât feed someone elseâs child.Â
TL;DR: Donât feed other peopleâs horses. You can make them SERIOUSLY ill. Treat animals in fields like animals at the zoo: youâre welcome to look, but donât meddle with their care.Â
PLEASE DONâT FEED OTHER PEOPLEâS HORSES.Â
Signal boosting the shit out of this. I watch this happen regularly at one of the stables I volunteer for, because the pasture is next to a hiking trail. Seriously, DONâT DO THIS.
For me, the ideal dog and handler relationship dynamic is a partnership. You, the trainer, are the senior partner, and your job is to train the rookie, have his back, and teach him everything you know, so one day he can have your back too.