varanustitanus:

palaeofail-explained:

palaeofail:

From the Creationist Wiki, which is apparently a thing that exists.

No evidence for feathered dinosaurs. Right.

There have been some fake fossils from China. So? These have been uncovered very quickly, and the vast majority are reputable. And other countries have fossil fakers too – why does China always get singled out?

Creationists or not, people who reject genuine evidence *AREN’T SCIENTISTS*!!!!!

That’s it. That’s the end. That’s the fact. There’s no more to that statement.

Also what is the deal with these people always using the word “prove”? First thing you learn about science is the scientific method. Things can either be supported or fail to be supported by evidence. There is no “proving” anything. If you can’t be bothered to understand the most basic concept of science then no one in the field has any reason to take you seriously.

tomthefanboy:

alil2confident:

end-area:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

prince-atom:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

brookietf:

stimpatch:

solanastera:

peppapigvevo:

maxiesatanofficial:

jasper-rolls:

maxiesatanofficial:

whitedusk2:

ORANGINA オランジーナ 

hey quick question what the fuck? hey, just, just a real quick question, what the Fuck

don’t act like you don’t know exactly what’s going on

fair point. let me amend my question:

WHY the fuck

how did this post miss the best 3 ones:

Those are absolutely the best three.

@gearholder

They’ve gotta be taking the piss.

< SCREMS

The cactus is definitely Advanced Lovemaking.

I see A LOT OF RISK HERE

don’t forget

The fuck?

Guys. Listen.
This is 100% market research.
Who has money?
FURRIES.
Who needs to stay hydrated in their costumes?
FURRIES.
Who avoids sports drinks due to their subliminal connection to mean jocks?
FURRIES.
Who has made it worthwhile for an international beverage brand to continue this marketing campaign for over FIVE YEARS?

I’ll give you one fucking guess.