Arizona cancels vaccine program after backlash from parents who don’t vaccinate

bubobubosibericus:

dr-archeville:

The state of Arizona has canceled a vaccine education program after receiving complaints from parents who don’t immunize their school-age children.

The pilot online course, modeled after programs in Oregon and Michigan, was created in response to the rising number of Arizona schoolchildren skipping school-required immunizations against diseases like measles, mumps and whooping cough because of their parents’ beliefs.

But some parents, who were worried the optional course was going to become mandatory, complained to the Governor’s Regulatory Review Council, which reviews regulations to ensure they are necessary and do not adversely affect the public.  The six-member council is appointed by Gov. Doug Ducey, with an ex-officio general counsel.

Members of the council questioned the state health department about the course after receiving the public feedback about it, emails show.  The state responded by canceling it.

The complaints that ended the pilot program came from about 120 individuals and families, including 20 parents who said that they don’t vaccinate their children, records show.

“We’re so sorry we couldn’t make a go of this — strong forces against us,”  Brenda Jones, immunization services manager at the Arizona Department of Health Services, wrote in an Aug. 6 email to a Glendale school official, along with a notification about the course’s cancellation.

In an email to two Health Department staff members on Aug. 14, Jones wrote that there had been “a lot of political and anti-vaxx” feedback.

“I’m not sure why providing ‘information’ is seen as a negative thing,” said state Rep. Heather Carter, R-Cave Creek, who spent the last three legislative sessions as chairwoman of the House Health Committee and helped create the pilot program.

“Providing information doesn’t take away a parent’s choice to seek an exemption. … This is a major concern.  Vaccines have saved lives for generations. We all want to live in safe and healthy communities.”

  • MORE: More children aren’t receiving vaccines from their doctors, CDC says

Losing ‘herd immunity’

Carter hosted meetings attended by physicians, nurses, school administrators, school nurses, naturopaths and public health officials that led to the creation of the 60- to 90-minute evidence-based vaccine education program.

It launched in 17 schools in three Maricopa County districts last academic year. The largest share of those schools was in the Paradise Valley Unified School District.

The education program was scheduled to expand to other Maricopa County schools this academic year, and to schools in Pima, Yavapai and Pinal counties during the 2019-20 school year.

State health officials said they have returned to the drawing board regarding the regulatory duty to provide vaccine education to Arizona parents seeking vaccine exemptions.

The overriding message they want parents to understand: Childhood vaccines are far safer than the diseases they prevent.

When too many kids skip getting vaccinated, schools and communities lose what’s known as “herd immunity.“  Without herd immunity, disease spreads more easily.  Babies too young to be immunized and adults and children with compromised immune systems — those with chronic diseases or undergoing chemotherapy for cancer, for example — are most vulnerable to the loss of the collective protection of the herd.

Kindergartners in Maricopa County as a whole are now below herd immunity for measles, said Dr. Rebecca Sunenshine, medical director for disease control for the Maricopa County Department of Public Health.

Maricopa County reflects national trends that show people who choose not to vaccinate their children tend to be higher income and white, she said.

“We are seeing an increase in vaccine exemptions and that is concerning because that does put us at greater risk for spread of disease, particularly outbreaks that could have been preventable,” said Jessica Rigler, branch chief for public health preparedness at the Arizona Department of Health Services.

“It’s difficult to actively offer education and that is something we are really trying to brainstorm.”

  • RELATED: Vaccines: Breaking down and debunking 10 myths

Feedback from parents

Most of the parents and others who contacted the Governor’s Regulatory Review Council about the vaccine education program were under the impression that they would be forced to take the course in order to obtain a personal belief vaccine exemption form. Many admitted they had not seen the course, but opposed it on principle.

Most of the emails did not identify where the parents live or where their children go to school.

Although the state never proposed the course be mandatory, wording on the state Health Department’s website left that impression.

The feedback was discussed at a council study session on July 31. Six days later the state Health Department discontinued the course.

“Based on that feedback, we thought it best to take a step back and really re-evaluate how the course was designed and whether or not we needed to do more evaluation,” Rigler said.

More than 200 pages of emails with public feedback about the vaccine education program were obtained by The Arizona Republic.  Nearly all were critical of additional steps associated with getting exemptions to vaccine requirements.

“In my experience, parents who have a personal belief against vaccines have already performed countless hours of extensive research on the benefits and risks of vaccines,” one parent wrote on July 26.  “A one-sided video is not going to change their minds and therefore it is a waste of government resources as well.”

The course appears to be an attempt to, “create an emotional response, creating fear and pressure in order to compel parents to vaccinate,” one set of parents wrote on July 25.  “Do lawmakers think we’re stupid?”

Several parents sent the same letter that said requiring them to watch a video to exercise a personal belief exemption is “an inappropriate interference with parental rights as currently defined by statute.”

One parent had the opposite worry: She wrote that she’d seen a post about the issue on Facebook, which is why she contacted GRRC.  She vaccinates her children and is worried too many Arizonans are succumbing to anti-vaccine fear mongering, and that it’s putting schoolchildren at risk.

The program was an attempt to prevent serious, vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks, Sunenshine said.

“All we wanted to do with the pilot was say, ‘We’re not going to make it harder, we just want to make sure you have accurate information when you make that decision,’” Sunenshine said.

“A lot of people don’t see these vaccine-preventable diseases anymore.  There’s this sense that they are no big deal because they haven’t seen them.  They don’t realize that before we had the measles vaccine in the 1960s we lost about 500 kids per year (in the U.S.) who died of measles.”

The county health department has heard from families with children who are medically vulnerable when herd immunity is lost, officials said. In some cases, families are fearful of sending those children to school, Sunenshine said.

Nearly every school that participated in the pilot education program wanted to participate again, and other schools were interested in trying it, Sunenshine said, adding that schools field a lot of questions from parents that the online course addressed in a uniform, scientific way.

  • RELATED: Kat Von D stirs controversy after saying she won’t vaccinate child

‘All you have to do is fill out a form’

The process began when a group of local pediatricians raised concerns about the need for vaccine education eight or nine years ago as personal belief vaccine exemptions were increasing in Arizona.

In 2015, the Arizona Medical Association passed a resolution calling for Arizona parents or guardians who do not wish to have their children vaccinated to receive public health-approved counseling that provides “scientifically accurate information about the childhood diseases,” including the potential adverse outcomes and the risks unimmunized children pose to children who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons.

“We spent many years working with stakeholders to develop a process that respects parents’ choices and provides timely, accurate and evidence-based information regarding vaccines,” Carter said.  “I’m concerned that unvaccinated children put our most vulnerable children at risk for diseases that we have essentially eradicated or dramatically decreased.”

Arizona is one of 18 states that allow parents and guardians to seek exemptions from required school vaccines for personal, moral or other beliefs.  Arizona has one of the most liberal personal belief exemption policies in the country, Sunenshine said.

“All you have to do is fill out a form. You don’t need a doctor’s signature,” Sunenshine said.  “Our laws make it so easy to exempt children from immunizations.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics views non-medical vaccine exemptions to school-required immunizations “as inappropriate for individual, public health, and ethical reasons and advocates for their elimination,” a September 2016 policy statement says.

A California law that took effect in 2016  —  a little more than a year after a measles outbreak erupted at Disneyland and spread to include seven Arizona cases — prohibits personal belief exemptions.  Children in California may still get exemptions for medical reasons, as long as their exemption is signed by a licensed physician.  Otherwise, they aren’t allowed to enroll in school.

The Arizona stakeholders decided California’s approach would not be a good option here, said Jennifer Tinney, program director for The Arizona Partnership for Immunization (TAPI).  

  • MORE: Phoenix is listed as a hotspot for kids not getting vaccines

‘We have to do something’

What the stakeholders did want was to make sure Arizona parents had access to accurate and up-to-date information as they made immunization decisions.

“The module was a really good middle ground.  It protected parents’ right to choose, which is an important factor for some of the parents here in the state,” Tinney said.  “But it also made sure that everyone had access to the same type of education as they were making their decision.”

The course included information about the diseases individual vaccines prevent and the complications a child faces if they contract those diseases.  The module was put together with scientifically proven information from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Oregon module, pediatricians and the state health department.  Maricopa County translated the program into Spanish.

“It (the course) makes sure that parents know that their decision not to vaccinate their children also has effects for the community,” Sunenshine said.

“It also makes sure they know that if there is an outbreak, which right now is just one case of a vaccine-preventable disease like measles in a school, that their children will be kept home for a minimum of 21 days until that outbreak is cleared from the school.”

The percentage of children who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons in Maricopa County has consistently been about 1 percent or less, but the percentage who aren’t getting vaccinated due to “personal beliefs” has been going up in recent years, state data shows.

During the last academic year, 5.9 percent of Maricopa County kindergarten students had nonmedical, “personal belief” exemptions.  During the 2010-11 academic year, the county rate was 3.4 percent.

The county is now working with the state to figure out how the educational module could be used in a way that’s acceptable to both schools and parents.

“We know that immunization rates are dropping and personal belief exemptions are rising,” Sunenshine said.  “It appears those two trends are going to continue. So we know we have to do something.  We are open to trying to do whatever we can to decrease the rate of exemptions and increase immunization rates.”

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN

@biologyweeps

Just… “Do lawmakers think we’re stupid?” Yeah, yeah they kind of do, dumbass. Everyone does, actually.

Arizona cancels vaccine program after backlash from parents who don’t vaccinate

So ur transphobic?

bizarrolord:

noitemsfoxonlyfinaldestination:

zampl:

new-url-genuine-blogging:

Transgenders are mentally ill. No other mental illness is solved by mutilation. 42% of transgenders end up committing suicide because their treatment failed and they ended up still looking like the same gender. You can’t expect someone to treat you like a woman if your shoulders are wider than your waist and you’re 6′2, nor a man if your waist is wider than your shoulders and you’re 5′4.

They’re also a minority of the population. We can afford to let them be treated, but if they can share bathrooms with the opposite sex before having their genitals castrated, child molesters, which make up a larger fraction of the population, would be able to mascaraed as trannies to molest children.

I love the bathroom argument because not even once has anything like that happened

What the hell. What the everloving hell.

I also sincerely wonder if this person would consider a lobotomy “mutilation”, or if it’s just surgeries they don’t like themselves that affect someone with a neurological disorder. 

Why do people care what someone does to their own body when said thing literally affects no one else? No one else is gonna be using those reproductive organs. Why do they give a shit if someone doesn’t want the particular ones they were born with?

Also, do people who refer to transgender people as “mutilating” their bodies have the same sort of objections to body modifications? Those are generally permanent. Do they vehemently oppose to people, say, stretching their earlobes?

What about cis women getting hysterectomies? Or cis men getting a vasectomy? How is that not “mutilation”? It’s “ruining” one’s reproductive organs, after all. Can’t have that!

Professor guilty of sexual harassment over bikini wax test question

bizarrolord:

yourownpetard:

  • Reginald Robinson was accused of sexual harassment by two students at Howard University in Washington D.C. in 2015
  • They complained about a test question which described a hypothetical bikini wax
  • The customer claimed to have fallen asleep and been inappropriately touched
  • Robinson’s question asked if they had a legal case against the salon owner
  • The students said they felt they were forced to reveal if they had ever had waxes themselves
  • They also said they did not like the use of the word ‘genitals’
  • Robinson must now undergo sensitivity training and have all of his test questions screened by another member of staff

Universities are fucked Episode 5,280

I could imagine this reaction (by parents, TBH) if this were a high school, but damn, a law school? People looking into being lawyers should be able to handle this shit. (Because guess what, if you’re going to be a trial lawyer, you’re going to have to deal with worse cases than this.)

I read the whole thing and I’m still really confused about how this was somehow harassment to people reading it, and how exactly this made students feel “they were forced to reveal if they had ever had waxes themselves”. Like what the actual hell?

Professor guilty of sexual harassment over bikini wax test question

bizarrolord:

wanderingberserker:

yourownpetard:

hardboiledoldman:

bogleech:

the latest evil secret of vaccines: mutant transgender potion

not my screenshot, I never would have protected these names

so if you bust a nut in someone are you gonna mutate them?

Wait, do vaccines have human DNA in them?

As far as I can tell, some of the vaccines are made from human embryo cells (such as Hepatitis, MMR, Chickenpox, one of the Rabies vaccines, etc). What this means though, is that for the growth of the virus, human embryo cells from aborted fetuses may be used. Other embryonic cells used include rats, chickens, monkeys, etc.

That being said, the thought of these vaccines being ‘mutant transgender potions’ is the stupidest shit I’ve heard since hearing I could buy the Brooklyn Bridge for a really cheap price.

Basically, even with those vaccines containing such materials, the processing of the vaccines to make them fit for use would cause complete breakdown of human DNA molecule. On top of which, external DNA would not automatically incorporate itself into the cellular DNA for reproduction. If it did, gene therapy would be INFINITELY easier than it currently is.

According to this logic, the more spooge a woman has had inside her, the closer she is to being a trans guy.

According to this logic we should all be plant mutants because we ingest plant DNA.

rainbowloliofjustice:

loryisunabletosupinate:

mysticdoughnut:

traumatizedofficial:

naeril:

atalefhashem:

rainbowloliofjustice:

If your character’s identity revolves around one trait, you’re probably writing a very shitty character. 

If you strip a character of all of their identity just to headcanon them as something, that is pretty fetishizing and nasty. 

Yeah yeah having LGBT, POC, characters and representation is all nice and dandy but remember they are supposed to be characters not a superficial trait because you want “representation” (which if being trans, poc, etc. is their only defining trait, that’s tokenism)

this is quite a long and strawmanny way of saying that lgbt people are fetishizing themselves for hcing characters as themselves lol. next!

also

“rainbow loli of justice”

Also not nice how op implies that poc are being racist against themselves. Op better not be a white.

Does OP even know what tokenism means lol???????

also like assuming that being trans or black or autistic is actually any character’s only defining trait is kinda shitty bc like literally when has a trans person ever made a trans character who had zero other characteristics

as if straight white is the default and those characters are just *full* of interesting traits

mfw all of you miss the entire point. So lemme try to spell this out for you in the most simplistic of ways.

and since @tramatizedoffical you care so much, I’m actually black. Anyways, to the point.

The point is that if you have literally nothing else interesting about you character outside of one trait, you wrote a shitty character. If you take away that trait, and you no longer have a character, you made a shitty character.

I never assumed that they would only ever be used as the only trait, I’ve seen and know of plenty of interesting LGBT, POC, and minority characters. On the flip side, I know of many uninteresting, and ultimately shitty LGBT, POC, and minority characters.

In one of my classes, someone asked if I could take a look at their character whom was trans. Whether they thought I was trans or not idk, idc, or maybe they just wanted to talk to someone about their character. Anyways. They proceeded to tell me about their character– everything about the character revolved around the fact that they were trans. Their hobbies, interests, friends, etc. it was all “because they’re trans.”. The result? A boring character. The character didn’t have a motivation, personality, etc. that didn’t revolve around how trans they were. It was shoved in your face, and you were constantly reminded of it to the point that during this, I actually had to ask “What else about them other than that they’re trans?”

“they’re black!” <– They’re response when I actually asked. Their character was fully uninteresting. Not because they’re black and trans, but because the entire character hinged on those traits alone. 

I myself have been on the flipside of this. After creating well over 10 pages of world lore, family trees, fleshing out all of the characters as much as possible, etc. I showed it to a classmate ‘cause they were curious to what I was working on and I asked what they thought, their response was akin to liking my world and character designs because they were POC. Nothing about the characters being interesting, nothing about the world or government, etc. Just that they liked the world and designs because they were POC. As someone who wants to go into character creation for a living that means one of two things.

1. I made shitty characters who didn’t have traits outside of being POC

2. That person ignored everything else about my world and characters despite the amount of effort and research I had put into it.

Naturally, after concluding that it was the second reason after a few more characters, and it was completely insulting. If I made my characters all white, and the person no longer liked the world or anything about my characters, then they never held any genuine interest to begin with.

I never “Implied” anything about the creator of the characters being LGBT, POC, etc. because literally, anyone is capable of doing the above. It was literally a general post, aimed at anyone interested in or wanting to make characters. If you only like a character because they’re LGBT, POC, etc. then it is pretty fetishizing because you’ve either stripped away or ignored any of their other traits, accomplishments, etc. its also an insult to the creator if they made a genuinely interesting and likable character with those traits.

Tl;dr: Stop making shitty characters that literally hinge their entire being on nothing else but being POC, a minority, LGBT, etc. and if you were to remove that trait, they’re completely flat, dull, and boring.

bizarrolord:

badsjw:

Don’t do this, unless you have the credentials to diagnose autism. They might have something completely different like social anxiety, or just be introverted. This trivializes autism and makes it seem like some sort of cult you get inducted in when you have certain traits. Autism is much more complicated than this post makes it seem. Just don’t diagnose other people unless you’re qualified, alright?

^Plus as someone who certain people in my past tried to push into the autism spectrum when I wasn’t in it (I actually have generalized anxiety), I do not appreciate this, and I can tell that my followers on the spectrum don’t either.

I cannot believe people actually think you can just diagnose someone with autism like that. Like, I know that these people have no fricking clue what autism actually is, but good gravy, this is deplorable.